Solved Ignoring ItemMeta?

What i want is for this line of code:

Code:Java

 
player.getInventory().removeItem(new ItemStack(Material.DIRT, 1));
 

to ignore ItemMeta. (Like if it has a displayname or lore) How would i do this? I've been trying for some time now but can't seem to find any way to do this. :/

 

What you should do is check if the material types are the same.

 

@CommonSenze Then what? I've been checking it alot of times but i always end up with needing to remove it no matter the ItemMeta. :/

 

@KarimAKL

Code:java

player.getInventory().remove(Material.DIRT);

This way removes all items that are the same Material. If you want a more specific way, like removing a specific itemstack, it is going to be more tricky.

 

@CommonSenze I just want to remove 1 dirt no matter what ItemMeta it has. (If it even has any)

 

@KarimAKL
Go through the players inventory in an int i = 0 for loop. Get the item in the certain slot, check if its not null, check the material is dirt, set the amount to the already determined amount minus one. <3

 

@CommonSenze Will try that now then, thank you.
EDIT: I just tried this:

Code:Java

 
public void removeItem(Player p) {
    PlayerInventory inv = p.getInventory();
    for (int i = 0; i < inv.getContents().length; i++) {
        if (inv.getItem(i) == null) {
            continue;
        }
        if (inv.getItem(i).getType() == Material.DIRT) {
            Integer amount = inv.getItem(i).getAmount();
            p.sendMessage("Amount: "+amount);
            if (amount > 0) {
                inv.getItem(i).setAmount(amount-1);
            }
            p.sendMessage("Amount: "+amount);
        }
    }
}
 

And it seems to work but i just have 2 problems now.
1. It doesn't remove 1 from the amount if you only have 1 of the item. :/ (I put 2 messages in there for testing)
2. It removes 1 from all the stacks of dirt i have, maybe something like this would block that?:

Code:Java

 
for (int i = 0; i < 1; i++) {
    //Do something with 1 of the items.
}
 

EDIT: Nvm, didn't work. (At least not the way i tried/imagined it might work)
Anyway, thanks for helping me finally get past that, it was actually pretty simple.. Now that i look at it i feel like an idiot, anyway thanks again. :7

 

Mark as solved

 

@MightyOne Whoops, my bad. Thank you for the reminder.