Thread Status:

Not open for further replies.

1. Offline

   Tomato

   Hello all,
   
   I am creating threads for each player and would like to be able to pass the thread the player object for use with the spout api. I am not doing any write operations on the object, just passing it around. Will having each thread pass it's player object to a synced PlayMusic wrapper cause a ConcurrentMod exception? Or should I be handling all player objects as strings and only perform the lookup in a synced scheduler runnable?
   
   Thanks!

    

   Tomato, Aug 31, 2011

   #1
2. Offline

   Tomato

   I guess what I am asking is if it is ok to pass around a player object to a thread but never modify it.

    

   Tomato, Sep 2, 2011

   #2
3. Offline

   Forge_User_54497078

   Well, the error you're asking about is ConcurrentModifyException, so I would say: Yes, it's ok.

    

   Forge_User_54497078, Sep 3, 2011

   #3

Thread Status:

Not open for further replies.

Your name or email address:

Do you already have an account?

• No, create an account now.
• Yes, my password is:
• Forgot your password?

Stay logged in