No. Bukkit is licensed under the GPL. CraftBukkit includes Bukkit code, but violates Bukkit's license because it includes NMS, whose source code...
There were no steps they could have taken because they never acquired the rights to the entirely of the project. Them repeatedly claiming to own...
Plus Mojang claiming they somehow own Bukkit. Control the infrastructure surrounding the project, yes. Own the code? I don't think so.
Given Bukkit is GPL and CraftBukkit binaries include Bukkit, the requirements imposed on CraftBukkit are those of the GPL. The CraftBukkit source...
That's irrelevant for the purposes of the GPL. For the project to be in the clear, the Bukkit team would need to license the deobfuscated source...
If Mojang owns Bukkit now, then they are responsible for Bukkit's violation of the GPL.
I'm confused, then. If the Minecraft server source isn't included in CraftBukkit, then what is this?...
TheBeast808, could you please benchmark with the newest versions of each plugin? Or, if you don't have time, can you post your testing code, so...
What is BUKKIT-3542?
Wrong. He has no explicit constructor, which means there is a implicit public no-args constructor. With the source code he posted, he should use...
Yes, this is brilliant.
For a String s that contains the name of the command... getCommand(s).setExecutor(Class.forName("me.davejavu.test.command."+s+"."+s).newInstance());
Separate names with a comma.
