Solved Would this be a valid permissions setup

Okay so I figured it out. You can have as many layers as you need (A layer would be like Layer1.Layer2.Layer3), but something important to note when testing is that (at least with group manager) an OP has all permissions. Meaning that Player.hasPermission() always returns true for Ops.

The original Question (open) The original Question (close)

Well as the title of this thread says, I'm wondering if this would work (I can't test until Monday so I'm just coding without an IDE right now.

Also if someone has example.* will they automatically get the permissions in the sublevels or do I have do check if they have the top level permission?

Code:yml

 
permissions:
example.*:
description: Gives access to all groups of perms
children:
example.group1.*: true
example.group1.*:
description: Gives access to group1 of perms
children:
example.group1.perm1: true
example.group1.perm1:
description: Allows you access to perm1
 

 

Code:

permissions:
    DeluXe.Launch:
        description: Allows The Player To Get Launched
        default: op
    DeluXe.NoFall:
        description: Stops FallDamage When Launched
        default: op
    DeluXe.DoubleJump:
        description: Allows The Player To Use DoubleJump
        default: op
    DeluXe.*:
        description: Allows All The Permissions To Be Used
        children:
            DeluXe.Launch: true
            DeluXe.NoFall: true
        default: op

These are my permissions i guess you could edit it to your liking

 

I need at least 3 levels. Not 2. I am only asking this because I'm unsure if it will be parsed wrong because of the second dot for the third level in my example.

 

Code:

    DeluXe.*:
        description: Allows All The Permissions To Be Used
        children:
            DeluXe.Launch: true
            DeluXe.NoFall: true
        default: op

Under the "children:" you can add as much "children" as you want i am sorry if this does not answer your question, i am having a hard time understanding what you are asking.

 

Seems to follow standard permission rules to me.
Id guess give example.* and check if example.group1.perm1 is true to validate?

 

Can't test for a week so that's why I'm asking.
But you're right it does follow the standard rule. Kinda.